|
 |
 |
 |
Two-phase nozzle
Optimisation of a Two-Phase Nozzle with an ES.
The animation below depicts a (1 + 1)-ES optimising the shape of a two-phase
nozzle. This is one of the 'classics' in the field.
![[Start.gif]](valise/bcraenen/Start.gif) |
![[Result.gif]](valise/bcraenen/Result.gif) |
| Starting nozzle |
Resulting nozzle |
![[Duese.gif]](valise/bcraenen/Duese2.gif)
Additive binomial length variation of the genotype Given the task
of determining the internal shape of a two-phase jet nozzle with maximum thrust
under constant starting conditions, H.-P. Schwefel was one of the first to use
gene duplication and deletion.
Since no simulation model was available at the time an experimental
optimisation had to be performed, using a so-called (1+1) Evolution Strategy.
The nozzles were built of conical pieces such that no discontinuity within the
internal shape was possible. In this way every nozzle shape could be represented
by its overall length and the inside diameters at the borders between the
segments (every 10mm). For technical reasons the incoming diameter of the first
segment had to be 32mm and the smallest diameter was fixed to 6mm resulting in
an convergent-divergent structure of the nozzles.
The genotype of each nozzle had the following form:
- Z1, Z2, D{-nc}, ..., D{-1}, D{1}, ..., D{nd}, where Z1 and Z2 denote the
number of segments in the convergent (divergent, respectively) part of the
nozzle, i.e. the number of segments in front of or behind the smallest diameter.
- D{-nc}, ..., D{-1} designate the diameters in the convergent part and D{1},
..., D{nd} those in the divergent part of the nozzle.
Since there was
only a fixed number of possible diameters during each run, the problem
essentially was a variable-dimensional integer optimisation task. Thus, the
standard mutation operator of ESs could not be used. Instead, mutation was
carried out in the following form:
- Z1 and Z2 were mutated with the help of a probability table comparable to an
additive binomial mutation of the form: Zi' = Zi + chi, where chi + 2 ~ B(4,
0.5), i = 1, 2 The table puts a stronger emphasis on no mutation at all.
- According to the new lengths Z1' or Z2', segments were added or deleted at
positions chosen at random. In the case of gene duplication the additional
element(s) had the same diameter as the element to be duplicated.
- Finally, all diameters Di, i = -nc, ..., -1, 1, ..., nd are varied using the
same probability table, this time resulting in: Di' = Di + 2 chi, i.e. the
diameters change in 2mm steps.
Despite the use of a very simple (1+1)
ES without recombination this first ES using gene duplication and deletion
produced astonishingly good results resulting in a 'strange' nozzle shape.
 |
|
 |
 |
|
You can participate to this forum if you register
|
|
|
 |
 |
|